Market liquidity has a strong impact to the economy of any jurisdiction; it is defined as the ease of converting an asset into cash without interfering with its market price.
The Capital Market Authority of Kenya (CMA) is the regulatory board meant to oversee the securities exchange in the Kenyan market; defining key policies that governs and institutionalize the economy of the nation through the galvanization of the Securities' market. It has a leviathan responsibility in molding one of the marquee economic indicator of Kenya; and setting up a productive environment that would imbue a positive market liquidity and stock price efficiency.
For a while, the foreign ownership in the market has been capped at 75pc; with the intentions of improving the market liquidity of the security market, the CMA in January, 2015; removed the cap allowing the foreign investors' shareholding to a hundred percent. I believe the analysts and the advisors in this case came from the school of thoughts that heavily borrowed their philosophies from the strategic trade model of Kyle (1985). Before the removal of the cap in 2015, they had introduced a faster settlement cycle, which translated into a reduced time frame from four to three days (Jul, 2011); and later in Jun, 2014, the NSE converted from a privately owned enterprise to a publicly owned enterprise (demutualization).
The whole idea of the changes by the CMA to the NSE were meant to improve the investors' confidence, both foreign and local; but with an assumption of the savers being differentially informed forgetting about the noise investors, who are mainly local and are found amidst the youths of the nation. This brings in the arguments on the impact of information asymmetry on market liquidity.



